fbpx

Case Study

How we helped turn a 1–3% margin business profitable with a self-service portal

We implemented a custom, client-facing self-service portal built on Salesforce to automate complex spare parts ordering, transforming a low (1-3%) margin business into a profitable enterprise.

Headquarters

Dubai, UAE

Company Size

25 employees

Industry

Manufacturing

Aleksey, the founder of the Meccanica Middle East, found me through my YouTube channel. A company based in Dubai.

Their business is niche, but critical: supplying spare parts to small companies that lease heavy farm equipment across the Middle East.

When a crucial harvester breaks down during harvest season, they need a part now. That’s the service.

The Challenge

Their challenges were partially technical, partialy on the business side:

  • Millions of SKUs: Every piece of farm equipment, every tractor, every combine, uses tens of thousands of parts. Their database held millions.
  • Low Margin Business: This is a volume game. Margins are tiny. We’re talking 1%, 3%, maybe 5% on a deal. High turnover was essential.

The real killer was the inbox. All orders came via email. Clients would send anything. A random part number. A combine model. Sometimes, just a photo of a wrench and a message: “I need this, fast.”

Every morning started with a detective puzzle. The small sales team had to manually decode every single email. They weren’t selling; they were translating hieroglyphics. This inefficiency killed their margin on every single transaction through slow speed of inquiry processing.

The goal was simple: Process orders faster and cheaper to defend that tiny margin.

Want to read the full case study? Drop your name and email below. Since I’m sharing sensitive project details, I’d love to know who I’m sharing them with.

 
 

Read full case study

    Case Study

    How We Raised a Driving School’s Revenue by 3.5x in Two Months

    Our goal was to increase conversion rates. So we built a simple system that turned every inquiry into a tracked, accountable sale and none of it required costly tools or complex platforms. Learn more how we did that.
     

    Headquarters

    Riga, Latvia (Europe)

    Company Size

    100 employees

    Industry

    Education

    A few years ago, I got a call from Credo Autoprieks.

    It’s a driving school in the Baltics, headquartered in Riga.

    They were substantial. A merger of two large schools, creating one unified operation.

    My contact was Maxim, their Marketing Director.

    His difficulty was straightforward, yet frustrating:

    • They had a significant advertising budget. Substantial for a local school.

    • They were essentially purchasing all the available ad inventory.

    • They were generating a high volume of leads. The reports confirmed it!

    • But sales were stagnant. No change at all.

    More leads. Identical sales. 

    The Challenge

    When we examined the operation, we found the disarray.

    Any online application, any prospect, was routed as an email to a single shared inbox.

    Who handled it? – “A staff member.”

    Out of five people in the office, one person was assigned to “process the inbox” that day.

    • They sometimes called back within an hour.

    • Sometimes in a week.

    • Sometimes never.

    The volume overwhelmed them. Emails were opened, marked as “read,” and then completely missed. A missed inquiry is a lost transaction, but a missed email is a hidden liability.

    The Real Core Issue (It Wasn’t Technology)

    Maxim approached me with a concept: “We require a monitoring instrument. A CRM.”

    We met. I asked him a very simple question:

    “Assume we implement the greatest CRM in the world tomorrow. Every prospect is tracked perfectly. Who is going to respond to them?

    Silence.

    The insight was clear.

    The issue wasn’t the application. The issue was the absence of a defined method and the staff to execute it.

    We needed personnel before we needed code.

    The competitor, Einstein Driving School, was a factor. They were using a great website, online tests, and aggressive Social Media Marketing (SMM). We were already out of budget space. We had to improve our output with what we had.

    We decided to hire two dedicated staff members.

    But that wasn’t enough. People need direction. They needed to know what to say.

    The existing staff were just advisors. They answered: “When does the course start?”

    They were not salesman.

    We needed sales scripts.

    Want to read the full case study? Drop your name and email below. Since I’m sharing sensitive project details, I’d love to know who I’m sharing them with.

    Read full case study

      Case Study

      How we increased EBITDA by 2% with automation and system

      We built a custom logistics CRM, automating high-volume quoting, credit control, and document generation to cut operational costs and deliver a 2% rise in annual EBITDA.

      Headquarters

      Riga, Latvia (Europe)

      Company Size

      100 employees

      Industry

      Logistics

      Some time ago, commercial director of the company Vervo, namely Andris Zigurs, has reached out to me.

      He reached out through my website form. He needed experts, specifically he was looking for someone who could help with full cycle CRM implementation.

      Their business is brokering freight. They connect customers with haulers. They focus on FTL (Full Truckload) and LTL (Less Than Truckload) shipping.

      The Challenge

      Vervo’s main challenge was high operational costs. They were drowning in detail.

      When a client makes a shipping inquiry, the process has many painful steps, more specifically two main areas:

      • Collect everything from a client about the cargo Dimensions, weight, type (temperature-controlled, hazardous, etc.), origin address, destination address, and timelines.
      • Find the Hauler for the cargo. Vervo uses its own fleet but mostly relies on a massive network of subcontractors. This link had to be organized.

      The sales reps made too many mistakes, since work is very detailed and was done in large…no, rather say MASSIVE volumes. Humans are just not designed to handle that much small tasks.

      The biggest time-waster was getting quotes.

      How things work. A client sends a request. That request goes out to multiple haulers. The haulers reply. Every reply has to be saved, compared, and stored for future statistics.

      This high-volume communication funnel created massive friction.

      It ate time. It ate money through operational overheads. Just image having couple hundreds quotes per day, that generate at least two, but normally up to four inquiries sent to haulers.

      Deals are not closed immediately the same day, so you still have to follow up on the inquiries from couple of previous days, which stack up in thousands of ongoing communications, often with the same people.

      Sometimes, cost of processing an order—the time spent getting quotes and managing emails—was higher than the margin on the job itself.

      The company was rapidly growing. Order volume was up. Revenue was up. But operational efficiency was sinking. They were profitable, but nowhere near as profitable as they should have been.

      Want to read the full case study? Drop your name and email below. Since I’m sharing sensitive project details, I’d love to know who I’m sharing them with.

      Read full case study

        Building better client relationships through systems and automation.

        © 2025 · Muncly · All rights reserved · Any reproduction or copy should be followed by a DOFOLLOW link to this website.